Reading comprehension passages (including poems & cartoons), Modern Math:… Test for XAT: 95 Questions with Solutions & Analysis

Attempt the Reading comprehension passages (including poems & cartoons), Modern Math:… test for XAT: 95 exam-level questions, detailed solutions and performance analysis. First questions free.

Paper breakdown

95 questions · 95 marks · 111.99 minutes. Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI): 28 · Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning (VALR): 26 · Decision Making (DM): 21 · General Knowledge (GK): 20

Free sample questions from Reading comprehension passages (including poems & cartoons), Modern Math:…

Question 1 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) · 2025 MCQ

Common Description:

In an 8-week course, a professor administered a test at the end of each week. Each of the eight tests was scored out of 4 marks, and a student could only receive a non-negative integer score.

Two students, Ravi and Sumana, took the eight tests.

In the first test, Ravi and Sumana scored the same marks. From the second to eighth tests, Ravi scored the exact same non-zero marks. Sumana scored the same marks as Ravi from the fifth test onwards. Ravi’s total marks in the first three tests was the same as Sumana’s total marks in the first two tests. Also, Sumana’s marks in the first test, total marks of the first two tests, and total marks of the eight tests are in a geometric progression.

Which of the following CAN be true?

A.
Ravi scored 4 marks in the third test
B.
Sumana scored 2 marks in the first test
C.
Ravi scored 0 marks in the fifth test
D.
Sumana scored 3 marks in the second test
E.
Sumana scored 4 marks in the eighth test

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: Same setup as P1, but we do not fix $k$ . We must check all valid $(a, k)$ pairs to see which option CAN be true.

Step 1: From P1, we know $S_{2} = 2 k$ and $S_{3} + S_{4} = \frac{4 k ^{2}}{a} - 2 k$ .

Step 2: Check Option A: $R_{3} = k = 4$ . If $k = 4$ , $S_{2} = 8$ , which exceeds the max score of 4. False.

Step 3: Check Option B: $S_{1} = a = 2$ . If $a = 2$ and $k = 1$ , $S_{3} + S_{4} = 4/2 - 2 = 0$ . This is valid ( $S_{3} = 0, S_{4} = 0$ ). So B can be true.

Step 4: Check Option C: $R_{5} = k = 0$ . But $k$ is non-zero. False.

Step 5: Check Option D: $S_{2} = 2 k = 3 ⟹ k = 1.5$ , not an integer. False.

Step 6: Check Option E: $S_{8} = k = 4 ⟹ S_{2} = 8$ , invalid. False.

Answer: B

Question 2 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) · 2025 MCQ

Common Description:

In an 8-week course, a professor administered a test at the end of each week. Each of the eight tests was scored out of 4 marks, and a student could only receive a non-negative integer score.

Two students, Ravi and Sumana, took the eight tests.

If Ravi scored 4 marks in the first test, how many marks did Sumana score in the third test?

A.
3
B.
0
C.
1
D.
4
E.
2

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a logical reconstruction problem involving integer constraints and geometric progressions. We translate the narrative into algebraic equations and use integer bounds to find the exact values.

Step 1: Define variables. $R_{1} = S_{1} = a = 4$ . $R_{2} = \dots = R_{8} = k$ . $S_{5} = \dots = S_{8} = k$ .

Step 2: $R_{1} + R_{2} + R_{3} = S_{1} + S_{2} ⟹ 4 + 2 k = 4 + S_{2} ⟹ S_{2} = 2 k$ .

Step 3: Since $S_{2} \leq 4$ , $2 k \leq 4 ⟹ k \in {1, 2}$ .

Step 4: GP condition: $S_{1}, S_{1} + S_{2}, T_{S}$ are in GP. $T_{S} = \frac{( 4 + 2 k ) ^{2}}{4} = 4 + 4 k + k^{2}$ .

Step 5: Also $T_{S} = 4 + 2 k + S_{3} + S_{4} + 4 k = 4 + 6 k + S_{3} + S_{4}$ .

Step 6: Equating $T_{S}$ : $4 + 4 k + k^{2} = 4 + 6 k + S_{3} + S_{4} ⟹ S_{3} + S_{4} = k^{2} - 2 k$ .

Step 7: Since $S_{3}, S_{4} \geq 0$ , $k^{2} - 2 k \geq 0 ⟹ k (k - 2) \geq 0$ .

Step 8: For $k = 1$ , $S_{3} + S_{4} = - 1$ (Invalid). For $k = 2$ , $S_{3} + S_{4} = 0$ .

Step 9: Since scores are non-negative, $S_{3} = 0$ and $S_{4} = 0$ .

Answer: B

Question 3 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) · 2025 MCQ

Common Description:

In an 8-week course, a professor administered a test at the end of each week. Each of the eight tests was scored out of 4 marks, and a student could only receive a non-negative integer score.

Two students, Ravi and Sumana, took the eight tests.

If Ravi scored 1 mark in the second test, what is the maximum possible value of Sumana’s total marks in all the eight tests together?

A.
10
B.
12
C.
9
D.
Cannot be uniquely determined from the given information
E.
8

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a logical reconstruction problem involving integer constraints, arithmetic progressions, and geometric progressions. We translate the narrative into algebraic equations and use integer bounds to find valid cases.

Step 1: Define variables. Let $R_{i}$ and $S_{i}$ be scores. $R_{2} = \dots = R_{8} = k$ . $R_{1} = S_{1} = a$ . $S_{5} = \dots = S_{8} = k$ .

Step 2: $R_{1} + R_{2} + R_{3} = S_{1} + S_{2} ⟹ a + 2 k = a + S_{2} ⟹ S_{2} = 2 k$ . Since $S_{2} \leq 4$ , $k \in {1, 2}$ .

Step 3: GP condition: $S_{1}, S_{1} + S_{2}, T_{S}$ are in GP. $T_{S} = \frac{( a + 2 k ) ^{2}}{a} = a + 4 k + \frac{4 k ^{2}}{a}$ .

Step 4: Also $T_{S} = a + 2 k + S_{3} + S_{4} + 4 k = a + 6 k + S_{3} + S_{4}$ .

Equating: $S_{3} + S_{4} = \frac{4 k ^{2}}{a} - 2 k$ .

Step 5: Given $R_{2} = 1 ⟹ k = 1$ . Then $S_{3} + S_{4} = \frac{4}{a} - 2$ .

Since $S_{3}, S_{4} \geq 0$ , $\frac{4}{a} \geq 2 ⟹ a \leq 2$ .

If $a = 1$ , $S_{3} + S_{4} = 2$ , $T_{S} = 1 + 4 + 4 = 9$ .

If $a = 2$ , $S_{3} + S_{4} = 0$ , $T_{S} = 2 + 4 + 2 = 8$ .

Maximum $T_{S}$ is 9.

Answer: C

Question 4 · Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning (VALR) · 2023 MCQ

Read the following paragraph and answer the question that follows.
The fundamental laws that govern the smallest constituents of matter and energy, when applied to the Universe over long enough cosmic timescales, can explain everything that will ever emerge. This means that the formation of literally everything in our Universe, from atomic nuclei to atoms to simple molecules to complex molecules to life to intelligence to consciousness and beyond, can all be understood as something that emerges directly from the fundamental laws underpinning reality, with no additional laws and forces.
Which of the following can be BEST inferred from the paragraph above?

A.
Everything in the Universe fundamentally occurs randomly.
B.
Fundamental laws undergo a change from atom to the Universe.
C.
Fundamental laws operating in the Universe and in an atom are the same.
D.
All phenomena in the Universe are fundamentally dependent on long cosmic timescales.
E.
All phenomena in the Universe fundamentally occur spontaneously

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is an "inference" reading comprehension question, recognizable because it asks what can be "BEST inferred" from a short paragraph about fundamental laws.

Step 1: Analyze the passage's core claim. The "fundamental laws that govern the smallest constituents of matter and energy" can explain "everything that will ever emerge" in the Universe.

Step 2: Note the key qualifier: this happens "with no additional laws and forces."

Step 3: Evaluate the options.

Option A ("randomly") is not mentioned or implied.
Option B ("undergo a change") directly contradicts "no additional laws and forces."
Option C ("Fundamental laws operating in the Universe and in an atom are the same") is a direct inference from the idea that the laws governing the "smallest constituents" (atoms) explain everything in the "Universe" without additional laws.
Option D ("dependent on long cosmic timescales") is a distortion. The passage says the laws, when applied over long timescales, explain emergence, not that all phenomena are fundamentally dependent on those timescales to exist.
Option E ("spontaneously") is not supported by the text.

Answer: C

Question 5 · Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning (VALR) · 2024 MCQ

Common Description: Beauty has an aesthetic, but it is not the same as aesthetics, not when it can be embodied, controlled by powerful interests, and when it can be commodi ed. Beauty can be manners, also a socially contingent set of traits. Whatever power decides that beauty is, it must always be more than reducible to a single thing. Beauty is a wonderful form of capital in a world that organizes everything around gender and then requires a performance of gender that makes some of its members more equal than others.
Beauty would not be such a useful distinction were it not for the economic and political conditions. It is trite at this point to point out capitalism, which is precisely why it must be pointed out. Systems of exchange tend to generate the kind of ideas that work well as exchanges. Because it can be an idea and a good and a body, beauty serves many useful functions for our economic system. Even better, beauty can be political. It can exclude and include, one of the basic conditions of any politics. Beauty has it all. It can be political, economic, external, individualized, generalizing, exclusionary, and perhaps best of all a story that can be told. Our dominant story of beauty is that it is simultaneously a blessing, of genetics or gods, and a site of conversion.
You can become beautiful if you accept the right prophets and their wisdoms with a side of products thrown in for good measure. Forget that these two ideas—unique blessing and earned reward—are antithetical to each other. That makes beauty all the more perfect for our(social and political) time, itself anchored in paradoxes like freedom and property, opportunity and equality. Based on the passage, which of the following CANNOT be inferred about beauty?

A.
Beauty is no longer an abstract concept.
B.
Beauty has become an aspirational good.
C.
Different powers and in uences delineate beauty for us.
D.
Beauty is de ned and appreciated by the perceiver.
E.
The beautiful does not de ne the standards of beauty.

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a negative inference question asking what CANNOT be inferred from the passage about beauty.

Step 1: Analyze the passage's claims about beauty. Beauty is "embodied, controlled by powerful interests", "commodified", a "socially contingent set of traits", and "Whatever power decides that beauty is".

Step 2: Evaluate the options.

Option A: "no longer an abstract concept" can be inferred because it is "embodied", "a good", and "a body".
Option B: "aspirational good" can be inferred from "site of conversion" and buying "products".
Option C: "Different powers... delineate beauty" can be inferred from "controlled by powerful interests".
Option E: "The beautiful does not define the standards" can be inferred because "Whatever power decides" and "prophets" set the standards, not the beautiful individuals themselves.
Option D: "defined and appreciated by the perceiver" CANNOT be inferred. The passage explicitly states beauty is "controlled by powerful interests" and is a "socially contingent set of traits", meaning it is dictated by external systems and powers, not the individual perceiver's personal appreciation.

Answer: D

Question 6 · Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning (VALR) · 2024 MCQ

Common Description: If we imagine the action of a vaccine not just in terms of how it affects a single body, but also in terms of how it affects the collective body of a community, it is fair to think of vaccination as a kind of banking of immunity.
Contributions to this bank are donations to those who cannot or will not be protected by their own immunity.
This is the principle of herd immunity, and it is through herd immunity that mass vaccination becomes far more effective than individual vaccination.
Any given vaccine can fail to produce immunity in an individual, and some vaccines, like the in uenza vaccine, are less effective than others. But when enough people are vaccinated with even a relatively ineffective vaccine, viruses have trouble moving from host to host and cease to spread, sparing both the unvaccinated and those in whom vaccination has not produced immunity. This is why the chances of contracting measles can be higher for a vaccinated person living in a largely unvaccinated community than they are for an unvaccinated person living in a largely vaccinated community.
The unvaccinated person is protected by the bodies around her, bodies through which disease is not circulating.
But a vaccinated person surrounded by bodies that host disease is left vulnerable to vaccine failure or fading immunity. We are protected not so much by our own skin, but by what is beyond it. The boundaries between our bodies begin to dissolve here. Donations of blood and organs move between us, exiting one body and entering another, and so too with immunity, which is a common trust as much as it is a private account. Those of us who draw on collective immunity owe our health to our neighbors. Based on the passage, which of the following CANNOT be concluded?

A.
A vaccine cannot guarantee immunity in an individual.
B.
Our survival, as a community, is largely based on herd immunity.
C.
A vaccinated person may get infected if her surroundings are largely unvaccinated.
D.
Collective immunity protects those with compromised immune systems.
E.
Even, relatively, ineffective vaccines can stop the spread of viruses if enough people are vaccinated

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a "negative inference" reading comprehension question, recognizable because it asks what "CANNOT be concluded" from the passage.

Step 1: Understand the passage's claims about herd immunity. It acts as a "banking of immunity," protecting the unvaccinated and those with failed immunity, and relies on collective action.

Step 2: Evaluate each option against the text to find the one that is unsupported or contradicted.

Option A is supported: "Any given vaccine can fail to produce immunity in an individual."
Option C is supported: "a vaccinated person surrounded by bodies that host disease is left vulnerable."
Option D is supported: "Contributions to this bank are donations to those who cannot or will not be protected by their own immunity."
Option E is supported: "when enough people are vaccinated with even a relatively ineffective vaccine, viruses have trouble moving."
Option B claims "Our survival, as a community, is largely based on herd immunity." This is an extreme overstatement. The passage says mass vaccination becomes "far more effective," but does not claim community survival depends largely on it.

Answer: B

Question 7 · Decision Making (DM) · 2025 MCQ

Common Description:

Ned Flanders and Homer Simpson Partners Limited is a law firm, known for its unwavering commitment to client satisfaction. They treat the clients as family members who have grown along with the firm. Further, they are highly regarded in the industry, consulted by the country’s top organizations. Among the founders, Homer Simpson is flamboyant, while Ned Flanders is serious. Together, they bring a dynamic balance to the team.

The organization believes in a strong socialization ritual that bonds the new lawyers(newcomers) with the existing members. Also, the socialization ritual ensures that newcomers fully understand the nature of their work and integrate seamlessly into the company’s culture. During their first week, newcomers are overloaded with a barrage of artificial tasks, unexpected client calls, and a challenging meeting with the founders. This results in newcomers getting overwhelmed, and doubting their decision to join the firm, only for the founders to meet them and reveal that this is one big prank and a way to welcome them to the organization. This socialization ritual has served them well for the past two decades. However, not all the newcomers appreciate the utility of this ritual.

One of the lawyers, Ms. Lisa Simpleton, who joined in 2023 and went through the same socialization ritual, found it unwelcoming. She believes that other newcomers might also share the same opinion. Lisa thinks that the current generation, especially post-COVID, needs more friendly welcome, and the firm must put an end to this ritual.

When a new batch of lawyers joins in 2024, Lisa feels that it is her moral responsibility to reprieve the newcomers from the ensuing stress. However, Lisa, like the others who joined along with her, is on probation for two years. During the probation period, her skills and performance are under evaluation. Upon successful completion of this twoyear assessment, she will be eligible for confirmation. Since she is yet to be confirmed, she wants to be seen as fitting within the organization’s culture.

Which of the following options will BEST enable Lisa to save the newcomers from the socialization ritual, without being singled out for questioning the organization’s culture?

A.
Seek a meeting with Ned Flanders, suggesting him to put an end to this practice.
B.
Meet one of the newcomers in secret and tell her about this practice.
C.
Organize a generic workshop for newcomers regarding workplace politics.
D.
Join a team of lawyers, petitioning to the founders to end this practice.
E.
Be silent this year until her performance review is over and she is confirmed.

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a "navigating workplace politics as a probationary employee" question, recognizable because the protagonist must achieve a goal (stopping a ritual) while protecting their own job security (not being singled out).

Why it applies: Lisa is on probation and needs to appear as a culture fit. Any solo action against a two-decade-old tradition will flag her as a troublemaker.

Step 1: Evaluate Option D. Joining a team of lawyers to petition distributes the risk. It achieves the goal of challenging the ritual while providing safety in numbers, ensuring Lisa is not singled out.

Step 2: Evaluate other options. Option A (meeting Ned) and Option B (secret meeting) are solo actions that highly risk singling her out. Option C (generic workshop) is passive-aggressive and avoids the core issue. Option E (silence) fails the primary goal of saving newcomers from stress.

Common trap: Choosing the most direct or morally pure action (like secretly warning newcomers or confronting the founder alone), which ignores the critical constraint of Lisa's probationary status and the risk of being singled out.

Answer: D

Question 8 · Decision Making (DM) · 2025 MCQ

Common Description:

When a new batch of lawyers joins the organization in 2024, they receive an anonymous email, warning them about the socialization ritual, just as it is about to start. Though no newcomer paid heed to the mail, the founders are furious. They call a meeting, and announce that while employees are welcome to express their opinions, this cowardly act of sending an anonymous email shall not be tolerated.

The watercooler discussions murmur Lisa’s name. Lisa is pleased that someone shares her perspective on the socialization ritual and has acted. However, she did not write the aforementioned email. As her name continues to be mentioned, she feels overwhelmed and wonders if she needs to do something about it.

Which of the following actions by Lisa can BEST enable her to defuse the situation?

A.
She should apologize to the founders, taking accountability for creating a climate that resulted in someone sending the anonymous email.
B.
She should simply focus on her work, and hope that the founders would ignore the rumours.
C.
She should send a public email clarifying that while she has reservations about the practice, she is not the author of the anonymous email.
D.
She should meet the founders and share that while she has reservations about the practice, she did not send the anonymous email.
E.
She should publicly apologize for having questioned the tradition of the organization to put all doubts to rest.

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a "crisis communication and reputation management" question, recognizable because a character is falsely implicated in a wrongdoing (anonymous email) and must defuse the situation without escalating it.

Why it applies: Lisa is being murmured about. She needs to clear her name proactively but professionally, acknowledging her known reservations without admitting to the anonymous act.

Step 1: Evaluate Option D. Meeting the founders directly is proactive, respectful of hierarchy, and allows her to honestly state her reservations while firmly denying authorship of the email. It defuses the rumor at the source.

Step 2: Evaluate other options. Option A and E involve apologizing for something she didn't do, which is professionally damaging. Option B (ignoring) lets the rumor fester. Option C (public email) escalates the issue into a public drama, which founders explicitly stated they would not tolerate ("cowardly act... shall not be tolerated").

Common trap: Choosing a public declaration (Option C) to clear one's name quickly, which violates the founders' explicit dislike for public/anonymous grandstanding and escalates the conflict.

Answer: D

Question 9 · Decision Making (DM) · 2024 MCQ

Common Description: In Symbolis, an upcoming medium sized IT services organization, only 1% of the employees were awarded an annual performance bonus. This annual performance bonus was decided by a committee formed of different functional heads. When Ms. Nalini Kattakayam received the annual bonus for the rst time in her ve years at Symbolis, Ms. Shalini Sampath, a colleague with seven years of tenure at Symbolis, told Nalini that this annual bonus was less a re ection of Nalini’s performance and more a recognition of those who have fostered a strong rapport with the powers that be. Incidentally, Shalini had never received any performance bonus in her tenure at the company. Since receiving the performance bonus, Nalini noticed a change in how her teammates behaved with her; they appeared indifferent towards her. Although there were no major issues, Nalini could not help but sense that her teammates began to perceive her as having a closer relationship with the top brass, following her recent accomplishment. Nalini assumed that her teammates might be in uenced by Shalini; consequently, they seemed to be avoiding informal interactions with her.
As Nalini had to rely on the support of her teammates, what could Nalini BEST do to normalize her relationship with them?

A.
Do nothing in the hope that things will normalize in time.
B.
Confront Shalini and ask her to stop spreading rumors.
C.
Invite her teammates for dinner on a weekend.
D.
Start saying negative things about their bosses to her teammates.
E.
Talk to her teammates regarding their indifference towards her.

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a "relationship repair and informal bonding" question, recognizable because a character faces passive indifference from their team due to perceived favoritism, and needs to normalize the relationship.

Why it applies: Nalini's team is indifferent, not openly hostile. Direct confrontation might make them defensive, and doing nothing leaves the issue unresolved. She needs a non-threatening way to rebuild rapport.

Step 1: Analyze the problem. The team is avoiding informal interactions due to perceived closeness to the "top brass." The issue is relational, not task-based.

Step 2: Evaluate the best approach. An informal, non-work setting like a weekend dinner (Option C) allows Nalini to build personal rapport, break the ice, and humanize herself without directly addressing the awkward "indifference" or confronting Shalini.

Step 3: Reject other options. Option A (do nothing) fails her need for team support. Option B (confront Shalini) escalates conflict with a senior colleague. Option D (negative talk) is toxic. Option E (talk about indifference) is a direct confrontation that will make the team defensive.

Common trap: Choosing to directly address the indifference (Option E) because it seems proactive, but it forces the team to admit their feelings and makes them defensive.

Answer: C

Question 10 · General Knowledge (GK) · 2025 MCQ

Who holds the position of Supreme Commander-in-chief of India’s armed forces?

A.
The Prime Minister
B.
The Chief of Defence Staff
C.
The Defense Minister
D.
The President
E.
The Home Minister

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a direct factual recall question about constitutional posts in India, recognizable by the specific title "Supreme Commander-in-chief".

Step 1: Identify the constitutional provision. Article 53(2) of the Constitution of India explicitly states that the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President.

Step 2: Differentiate from executive roles. While the Prime Minister and the Defence Minister hold political and administrative authority over the military, and the Chief of Defence Staff is the principal military advisor, the ceremonial and constitutional supreme command rests solely with the President.

Answer: The President.

Question 11 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

Consider the following statements regarding private sector integration in national logistics:

Dedicated private air cargo fleets are primarily designed to completely replace the national railway freight network for all long-distance transport.
E-commerce giants launch dedicated air cargo services to reduce dependency on third-party surface transport bottlenecks and accelerate delivery times.
Private logistics innovations are strategically viewed as complementary to public mega-infrastructure projects, aiming to collectively reduce national logistics costs as a percentage of GDP.

How many of the above statements are strictly correct?

A.
Only one
B.
Only two
C.
All three
D.
None

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a count_how_many question, recognisable because it requires evaluating multiple independent statements for factual accuracy based on the chapter's framework.

Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1. Private air cargo is designed to speed up specific high-value or time-sensitive deliveries, not to "completely replace" the national railway freight network, which handles the vast majority of bulk long-distance transport. This is false due to the absolute word "completely replace".

Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2. E-commerce giants (like Amazon) launch dedicated air cargo to bypass third-party surface bottlenecks and guarantee faster delivery. This is strictly correct.

Step 3: Evaluate Statement 3. The chapter framework explicitly states that private logistics innovations and public mega-infrastructure work together (are complementary) to achieve the macroeconomic goal of reducing logistics costs as a percentage of GDP. This is strictly correct.

Step 4: Count the correct statements. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Total = 2.

Answer: Only two.

Question 12 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

Match the following positions with their correct classification in the Indian governance framework:

Chief Justice of India
Chairperson of the Competition Commission of India
National Security Advisor
Governor of a State

Classifications:

A. Constitutional Post

B. Statutory Post

C. Executive/Advisory Role (Non-constitutional, Non-statutory)

Which of the following matches is INCORRECT?

A.
3 - A
B.
1 - A
C.
2 - B
D.
4 - A

Correct Answer:

Step-by-Step Solution

Key idea: This is a classification and exception-finding question, recognizable by the request to identify the single INCORRECT match between a government role and its legal classification.

Step 1: Evaluate Match 1 (Chief Justice of India - Constitutional Post). The CJI is established under Article 124 of the Constitution. This is a correct match.

Step 2: Evaluate Match 2 (CCI Chairperson - Statutory Post). The Competition Commission of India is established under the Competition Act, 2002. This is a correct match.

Step 3: Evaluate Match 3 (National Security Advisor - Constitutional Post). The NSA is an executive appointment operating under the PMO. It is not mentioned in the Constitution, nor is it created by statute. It should be classified as 'C' (Executive/Advisory Role). Therefore, matching it to 'A' is incorrect.

Step 4: Evaluate Match 4 (Governor of a State - Constitutional Post). The Governor is established under Article 153 of the Constitution. This is a correct match.

Step 5: Identify the incorrect match. The match "3 - A" is factually wrong.

Answer: 3 - A.

Section-wise Paper Structure

Free Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

Unlock All 95 Questions in Real Examination Mode

More XAT Test Series

Login to view the complete test and solutions

Personalised first. High quality throughout.

Built around you, not around a syllabus PDF

Revision that hits your weak spots

Questions calibrated to the real exam

Notes written for recall, not for volume

One place for everything

Honest progress

Unlock the whole course

Reading comprehension passages (including poems & cartoons), Modern Math:… Test for XAT: 95 Questions with Solutions & Analysis

Paper breakdown

Free sample questions from Reading comprehension passages (including poems & cartoons), Modern Math:…

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

Step-by-Step Solution

More XAT tests