RESIDENTS of Lozère, a hilly department in southern France, recite complaints familiar to many rural corners of Europe. In remote hamlets and villages, with names such as Le Bacon and Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about a lack of local schools, jobs, or phone and internet connections. Farmers of grazing animals add another concern: the return of wolves. Eradicated from France last century, the predators are gradually creeping back to more forests and hillsides. “The wolf must be taken in hand,” said an aspiring parliamentarian, Francis Palombi, when pressed by voters in an election campaign early this summer. Tourists enjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, but farmers fret over their livestock and their livelihoods. . .
As early as the ninth century, the royal office of the Luparii—wolf-catchers—was created in France to tackle the predators. Those official hunters (and others) completed their job in the 1930s, when the last wolf disappeared from the mainland. Active hunting and improved technology such as rifles in the 19th century, plus the use of poison such as strychnine later on, caused the population collapse. But in the early 1990s the animals reappeared. They crossed the Alps from Italy, upsetting sheep farmers on the French side of the border. Wolves have since spread to areas such as Lozère, delighting environmentalists, who see the predators’ presence as a sign of wider ecological health. Farmers, who say the wolves cause the deaths of thousands of sheep and other grazing animals, are less cheerful. They grumble that green activists and politically correct urban types have allowed the return of an old enemy.
Various factors explain the changes of the past few decades. Rural depopulation is part of the story. In Lozère, for example, farming and a once-flourishing mining industry supported a population of over 140,000 residents in the mid-19th century. Today the department has fewer than 80,000 people, many in its towns. As humans withdraw, forests are expanding. In France, between 1990 and 2015, forest cover increased by an average of 102,000 hectares each year, as more fields were given over to trees. Now, nearly one-third of mainland France is covered by woodland of some sort. The decline of hunting as a sport also means more forests fall quiet. In the mid-to-late 20th century over 2m hunters regularly spent winter weekends tramping in woodland, seeking boars, birds and other prey. Today the Fédération Nationale des Chasseurs, the national body, claims 1.1m people hold hunting licences, though the number of active hunters is probably lower. The mostly protected status of the wolf in Europe—hunting them is now forbidden, other than when occasional culls are sanctioned by the state —plus the efforts of NGOs to track and count the animals, also contribute to the recovery of wolf populations.
As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolves seen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those who celebrate the predators’ return. Farmers’ losses are real, but are not the only economic story. Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals’ spread is discussed, also generate income and jobs in rural areas. Which one of the following has NOT contributed to the growing wolf population in Lozère?
C
Step-by-Step Solution
Key idea: This is a 'Causal Verification / EXCEPT' question, recognisable by the capitalised NOT asking which factor did not contribute to a specific outcome.
Why it applies: The question requires verifying three true causes from the text and isolating the one false or irrelevant statement regarding the recent wolf population growth.
Step 1: Verify Option A (rural decline). Paragraph 3 states "Rural depopulation is part of the story... As humans withdraw, forests are expanding," which aided recovery. (True)
Step 2: Verify Option B (woodlands). Paragraph 3 notes forest cover increased, providing more habitat. (True)
Step 3: Verify Option D (protected status). Paragraph 3 explicitly states "The mostly protected status of the wolf... contribute to the recovery." (True)
Step 4: Verify Option C (Luparii). Paragraph 2 states the Luparii were shut down in the 1930s, which caused the wolves to disappear. This historical eradication effort did not cause the 1990s population recovery. (False)
Trap: Picking Option C because Luparii is a unique term found in the text. Students often select options containing specific text keywords without verifying the timeline or causal direction.
Answer: C