HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare Previous Year Questions (PYQs) for XAT: 6+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 6+ HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare previous year questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    Chapter Roadmap: HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare

    Chapter Roadmap

    HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare

    Step 1: Employee Welfare and Housing Policies
    Foundation of retention, statutory compliance, and quality of life. (Current Focus)
    Step 2: Campus Recruitment and Internal Mobility
    High weightage. Talent acquisition, onboarding, and internal career pathing.
    Step 3: Leave Management and Performance Appraisals
    Evaluating output, managing absences, and structuring feedback loops.

    The Strategic Core of Employee Welfare

    The Strategic Core of Employee Welfare

    Welfare is not merely a perk; it is a strategic operational tool designed to remove friction from an employee's life.

    The Core Intuition
    Cognitive Load Theory: If employees are stressed about basic needs, their mental bandwidth for complex problem-solving drops.
    Retention in Isolated Units: For R&D or remote facilities, welfare replaces the natural pull of city infrastructure.
    Productivity Link: High-quality welfare directly correlates with lower absenteeism and higher focus.

    In managerial caselets, always view welfare through the lens of organizational goals, not just employee comfort.

    HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare: Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Explanations (5 Problems)

    Question 1 · Decision Making (DM) MCQ

    Common Description:

    Abhishek, a student of a prestigious business school, gets interested in Payeasy, a fintech firm, after listening to a pre-placement talk by Neha Bhupati, a senior leader at the firm, and an alumna of the same business school.

    He joins Payeasy through campus placement. Neha plays a key role in recruiting him, seeing great potential in him.

    Abhishek starts working in the digital payments vertical under Mukesh Kumar, who reports directly to Neha.

    Mukesh, Abhishek’s direct superior, is impressed by his performance and rates him very high in the first year.

    Abhishek understands that if Mukesh consistently rates him as “Excellent Performer” for the second year as well, his chances of getting promoted will improve.(The organization promotes individuals who are consistently rated as “Excellent Performer” for at least two years by their immediate superiors.) Over time, Abhishek realizes that the learning opportunities in his current role have plateaued. Given his longstanding interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency, he starts exploring opportunities in that vertical within the company. This change is not possible without the consent of his immediate boss, Mukesh. When Abhishek brings this up with Mukesh, he acknowledges Abhishek’s curiosity and enthusiasm; however, he emphasizes how Abhishek’s competencies fit him rightly into the current vertical. Mukesh assures Abhishek of more challenging assignments in the future, provided he remains a good team player. Further, he shares his skepticism about the long-term prospects of cryptocurrency. Hence, Mukesh politely declines Abhishek’s request.

    After two years at Payeasy, Abhishek applies to a competing firm and is called for an interview. The hiring manager, Amit, is impressed with Abhishek and tells him that he will take the final decision to select Abhishek in a day or two. After the interview, Amit wants to know more about Abhishek since Abhishek will be leading a team of 15 people and his people management skills are very important for the team’s success. He calls Mukesh, Abhishek's superior. Mukesh is Amit's classmate who Amit trusts immensely.

    Mukesh informs Amit that though Abhishek is a good talent, he questions his superiors too often. Mukesh further shares that such a behavior makes it difficult for the superiors to manage the team.

    Amit needs a good talent, but is confused if he should recruit Abhishek, given Mukesh’s assessment of Abhishek.

    Which of the following data will BEST enable Amit to take a decision on Abhishek’s recruitment?

    1. A.

      Amit’s organization is very democratic, where people are encouraged to share their critical views without any fear of consequences.

    2. B.

      Two years back, Mukesh discouraged Amit from offering a role to one of his subordinates, who later went to a competing firm and is now a star performer there.

    3. C.

      Payeasy has been seeing attrition of good talent to Amit’s organisation in the recent past due to the high salaries that Amit’s organization offers.

    4. D.

      Mukesh is known to be very possessive of his subordinates.

    5. E.

      Abhishek was kind and cooperative throughout the selection process of Amit’s organization.

    Correct Answer:

    A

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a reference-check bias and cultural-fit evaluation question, recognizable because a hiring manager is confused by a negative reference about a specific trait. Step 1: Identify the hiring manager's dilemma. Amit likes Abhishek but is confused because Mukesh claims Abhishek "questions his superiors too often," which Mukesh frames as a people-management liability. Step 2: Analyze the trait in question. "Questioning superiors" can be viewed as insubordination in a rigid hierarchy, but as "critical thinking" or "constructive challenge" in a collaborative, democratic environment. Step 3: Evaluate the options for resolving the dilemma. Option D (Mukesh is possessive) explains why Mukesh might be biased, but it doesn't tell Amit if Abhishek will actually succeed in Amit's team. Option A states that Amit's organization is democratic and encourages critical views. Step 4: Select the best data. If Option A is true, the exact trait Mukesh criticizes is actually a desired strength in Amit's organization. This directly reframes the perceived weakness into a cultural fit, giving Amit a clear, positive reason to recruit Abhishek. Answer: A
    Question 2 · Decision Making (DM) MCQ

    Common Description:

    Abhishek, a student of a prestigious business school, gets interested in Payeasy, a fintech firm, after listening to a pre-placement talk by Neha Bhupati, a senior leader at the firm, and an alumna of the same business school.

    He joins Payeasy through campus placement. Neha plays a key role in recruiting him, seeing great potential in him.

    Abhishek starts working in the digital payments vertical under Mukesh Kumar, who reports directly to Neha.

    Mukesh, Abhishek’s direct superior, is impressed by his performance and rates him very high in the first year.

    Abhishek understands that if Mukesh consistently rates him as “Excellent Performer” for the second year as well, his chances of getting promoted will improve.(The organization promotes individuals who are consistently rated as “Excellent Performer” for at least two years by their immediate superiors.) Over time, Abhishek realizes that the learning opportunities in his current role have plateaued. Given his longstanding interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency, he starts exploring opportunities in that vertical within the company. This change is not possible without the consent of his immediate boss, Mukesh. When Abhishek brings this up with Mukesh, he acknowledges Abhishek’s curiosity and enthusiasm; however, he emphasizes how Abhishek’s competencies fit him rightly into the current vertical. Mukesh assures Abhishek of more challenging assignments in the future, provided he remains a good team player. Further, he shares his skepticism about the long-term prospects of cryptocurrency. Hence, Mukesh politely declines Abhishek’s request.

    Dissatisfied with Mukesh’s response, Abhishek reaches out to Neha for a vertical change. Though she listens to Abhishek, she shares her displeasure with the request. In fact, she brushes his request off, telling him to resign from Payeasy if it does not charm him anymore. Abhishek gets worried as he has a huge educational loan to pay, and such a departure will put him in a fix.

    Later that day, in one of the team meetings, Abhishek feels ignored as he is cut twice while he tries to share his project progress. Thereafter, he starts believing that Mukesh is not happy with him. This fear appears to get substantiated when Mukesh assigns an important project to another team member, which Abhishek wants to work on. His fear keeps growing regarding Neha and Mukesh not being happy with him. However, when he receives his annual rating, he finds out that Mukesh has rated him as the “best performer” of the year, based on his previous year’s performance.

    Abhishek wants his relationship with Mukesh to be back on track, as it was, before he reached out to Neha.

    Which of the following options will BEST enable Abhishek rebuild his relationship with Mukesh?

    1. A.

      Abhishek should stay low profile for some time as time heals the past.

    2. B.

      Abhishek should double down on his performance to demonstrate his value to the team.

    3. C.

      Abhishek should request Mukesh for an open discussion to get rid of any misunderstandings.

    4. D.

      Abhishek should request Neha to help him in rebuilding his relationship with Mukesh.

    5. E.

      Abhishek should reach out to Mukesh and apologize for his perceived immaturity.

    Correct Answer:

    C

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a workplace conflict and chain-of-command restoration question, recognizable because the protagonist bypassed their immediate manager and now needs to repair that specific relationship.

    Step 1: Identify the core breach. Abhishek bypassed Mukesh and went to Neha, which is a violation of the standard chain of command and can be perceived as insubordination or lack of trust.

    Step 2: Evaluate the current state. Mukesh still rated Abhishek as the "best performer", indicating that Mukesh values his work and has not permanently written him off. The friction is likely based on perceived disrespect rather than performance.

    Step 3: Assess the options. Staying low profile (A) is passive and leaves the misunderstanding unresolved. Doubling down on performance (B) is good but does not directly address the relational breach. Involving Neha again (D) would worsen the situation by reinforcing the bypass. Apologizing for "perceived immaturity" (E) is overly submissive and may not address the professional nature of the disagreement.

    Step 4: Select the best action. Requesting an open discussion (C) is proactive, professional, and directly targets the root cause: clearing up misunderstandings and re-establishing direct, respectful communication with the immediate boss.

    Answer: C

    Question 3 · Decision Making (DM) MCQ

    Common Description:

    Fine Elements Inc. is an Indian organization with a substantial presence in South and East India. The company is recruiting talent to expand in North and West India. The organization’s head of talent acquisition, Premnarayan, entrusts the interview process, a key stage in the recruitment process, to his line managers who take the responsibility of selecting candidates. Premnarayan, however, lays down stringent rules that the line managers need to follow to achieve consistent outcomes.

    Joginder Mahato, a line manager, has been interviewing candidates. During the interview, Joginder realizes that one of the candidates, Animisha, called for the interview, does not satisfy the necessary condition of five years experience. Upon enquiring, he finds out that this happened due to an oversight by an inexperienced secretary who was asked to prepare the shortlist for the interview. However, as Animisha is present for the interview, he decides to conduct her interview. Joginder finds Animisha’s candidature to be the best among the candidates he has interviewed so far.

    Joginder shares his preference for Animisha with Premnarayan, the talent acquisition head. However, while rolling out the offer, Premnarayan realizes that Animisha does not meet the eligibility criteria. Though the recommendation has come from Joginder, who is a senior, he wants to reject Animisha for the role.

    Which of the following reasons will BEST help him in rejecting Animisha’s candidature?

    1. A.

      Animisha was given a job offer while she interned with Fine Elements Inc. but she declined it.

    2. B.

      Premnarayan has overruled a few selection decisions of the seniors in the past.

    3. C.

      Animisha already holds a job offer from a rival firm at a competing salary.

    4. D.

      Joginder’s team, though lean, has been performing well for many years.

    5. E.

      Other potential candidates were rejected because of the change in the experience criterion.

    Correct Answer:

    E

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a procedural justice and administrative consistency question, recognizable because a manager wants to reject a candidate who lacks a formal eligibility criterion despite a senior's recommendation. Step 1: Identify the core conflict. Premnarayan (TA Head) must enforce rules, while Joginder (Line Manager) wants to make an exception for a good candidate. Step 2: Determine the goal. Premnarayan needs the BEST reason to justify rejection that is professionally sound and minimizes organizational risk. Step 3: Evaluate the options. Personal history (A, C) or past precedents of overruling (B) are weak or irrelevant. Team performance (D) is about Joginder, not Animisha. Step 4: Select the strongest administrative justification. Option E states that other candidates were already rejected for the same reason. This invokes procedural fairness and consistency. If Premnarayan makes an exception for Animisha, he opens the organization to claims of bias, favoritism, or unfair hiring practices. Consistency is the strongest shield in administrative decisions. Answer: E
    Question 4 · Decision Making (DM) MCQ

    Common Description:

    Fine Elements Inc. is an Indian organization with a substantial presence in South and East India. The company is recruiting talent to expand in North and West India. The organization’s head of talent acquisition, Premnarayan, entrusts the interview process, a key stage in the recruitment process, to his line managers who take the responsibility of selecting candidates. Premnarayan, however, lays down stringent rules that the line managers need to follow to achieve consistent outcomes.

    Joginder Mahato, a line manager, has been interviewing candidates. During the interview, Joginder realizes that one of the candidates, Animisha, called for the interview, does not satisfy the necessary condition of five years experience. Upon enquiring, he finds out that this happened due to an oversight by an inexperienced secretary who was asked to prepare the shortlist for the interview. However, as Animisha is present for the interview, he decides to conduct her interview. Joginder finds Animisha’s candidature to be the best among the candidates he has interviewed so far.

    Joginder wants to recommend Animisha for selection despite her not fulfilling the experience criterion.

    Which of the following reasons, IF TRUE, will BEST convince Joginder to recommend Animisha?

    1. A.

      The HR department has increased the experience criterion from 3 years to 5 years only this year.

    2. B.

      Animisha interned with one of the verticals of Fine Elements Inc. during her graduation.

    3. C.

      Animisha has a lucrative offer from a competing firm, for a similar role.

    4. D.

      Joginder was selected in his current role, a decade back, even though he had not satisfied many of the eligibility criteria.

    5. E.

      The role Animisha has applied for is one where getting good talent is not easy.

    Correct Answer:

    E

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a business-case justification for rule-bending question, recognizable because a line manager wants to recommend a candidate who fails a strict eligibility criterion. Step 1: Identify the goal. Joginder needs a compelling, objective reason to convince the organization to make an exception to the "5 years experience" rule for Animisha. Step 2: Evaluate the nature of valid exceptions. Organizations bend rules not for personal convenience, but for strategic business necessity. Step 3: Analyze the options. Option A (HR changed the rule) weakens the rule but doesn't highlight Animisha's unique value. Option B (internship) and C (competing offer) are weak or irrelevant to the experience gap. Option D (Joginder's past) is a logical fallacy (two wrongs don't make a right). Step 4: Select the strongest business case. Option E states that getting good talent for this role is not easy (talent scarcity). If talent is scarce, the organization has a strong business incentive to overlook a rigid experience criterion to secure a highly qualified candidate ("the best among the candidates he has interviewed"). Scarcity justifies flexibility. Answer: E
    Question 5 · Decision Making (DM) MCQ

    Common Description:

    The CEO of the Jamshedpur Tea Factory(JTF) was in a quandary over employees skipping work. It was becoming increasingly di cult for him to identify employees who faked illness to skip work. The work of the employees was complex and intricate, and they had to report to eight supervisors. “Faking illness” made it di cult for JTF to judiciously decide on “Promotion” and “Training” of employees. An employee could only be promoted on the completion of a multi-skilling training program. Further, to be nominated for the training program, an employee must be recommended by a minimum of six supervisors. JTF wanted to promote only sincere and deserving employees.

    Which of the following policies will be MOST prone to error while selecting deserving and sincere employees?

    1. A.

      Outsource all leave decisions to a doctor whose judgment will be nal

    2. B.

      Let the CEO o ce decide on promotions but supervisors will decide on the leave.

    3. C.

      Outsource all leave decisions to a lawyer whose judgement will be nal

    4. D.

      Let the CEO o ce decide on leave but supervisors will recommend the promotion.

    5. E.

      Let the CEO o ce decide on the leave as well as promotions.

    Correct Answer:

    C

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a domain-expertise and error-proneness evaluation question, recognizable because it asks for the policy that will be MOST prone to error.

    Step 1: Identify the core requirement. The question asks for the option that will lead to the highest error rate in selecting deserving employees or managing leave.

    Step 2: Evaluate domain expertise. Leave decisions for "faking illness" require medical or objective compliance expertise. Promotion decisions require domain expertise in the "complex and intricate" work.

    Step 3: Analyze the options. Option C suggests outsourcing leave decisions to a "lawyer". A lawyer has zero medical or HR compliance expertise regarding illness.

    Step 4: Conclude. Assigning medical/leave judgments to a legal professional completely lacks domain expertise, making it the most fundamentally flawed and error-prone policy among the choices.

    Answer: C

    More previous year questions (pyqs) in this unit

    chapter
    HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare Previous Year Questions (PYQs) for XAT: 6+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 6+ HR, Recruitment and Employee Welfare previous year questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    A question from this chapter

    Question 1

    Common Description:

    Abhishek, a student of a prestigious business school, gets interested in Payeasy, a fintech firm, after listening to a pre-placement talk by Neha Bhupati, a senior leader at the firm, and an alumna of the same business school.

    He joins Payeasy through campus placement. Neha plays a key role in recruiting him, seeing great potential in him.

    Abhishek starts working in the digital payments vertical under Mukesh Kumar, who reports directly to Neha.

    Mukesh, Abhishek’s direct superior, is impressed by his performance and rates him very high in the first year.

    Abhishek understands that if Mukesh consistently rates him as “Excellent Performer” for the second year as well, his chances of getting promoted will improve.(The organization promotes individuals who are consistently rated as “Excellent Performer” for at least two years by their immediate superiors.) Over time, Abhishek realizes that the learning opportunities in his current role have plateaued. Given his longstanding interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency, he starts exploring opportunities in that vertical within the company. This change is not possible without the consent of his immediate boss, Mukesh. When Abhishek brings this up with Mukesh, he acknowledges Abhishek’s curiosity and enthusiasm; however, he emphasizes how Abhishek’s competencies fit him rightly into the current vertical. Mukesh assures Abhishek of more challenging assignments in the future, provided he remains a good team player. Further, he shares his skepticism about the long-term prospects of cryptocurrency. Hence, Mukesh politely declines Abhishek’s request.

    After two years at Payeasy, Abhishek applies to a competing firm and is called for an interview. The hiring manager, Amit, is impressed with Abhishek and tells him that he will take the final decision to select Abhishek in a day or two. After the interview, Amit wants to know more about Abhishek since Abhishek will be leading a team of 15 people and his people management skills are very important for the team’s success. He calls Mukesh, Abhishek's superior. Mukesh is Amit's classmate who Amit trusts immensely.

    Mukesh informs Amit that though Abhishek is a good talent, he questions his superiors too often. Mukesh further shares that such a behavior makes it difficult for the superiors to manage the team.

    Amit needs a good talent, but is confused if he should recruit Abhishek, given Mukesh’s assessment of Abhishek.

    Which of the following data will BEST enable Amit to take a decision on Abhishek’s recruitment?

    Question 2

    Common Description:

    Abhishek, a student of a prestigious business school, gets interested in Payeasy, a fintech firm, after listening to a pre-placement talk by Neha Bhupati, a senior leader at the firm, and an alumna of the same business school.

    He joins Payeasy through campus placement. Neha plays a key role in recruiting him, seeing great potential in him.

    Abhishek starts working in the digital payments vertical under Mukesh Kumar, who reports directly to Neha.

    Mukesh, Abhishek’s direct superior, is impressed by his performance and rates him very high in the first year.

    Abhishek understands that if Mukesh consistently rates him as “Excellent Performer” for the second year as well, his chances of getting promoted will improve.(The organization promotes individuals who are consistently rated as “Excellent Performer” for at least two years by their immediate superiors.) Over time, Abhishek realizes that the learning opportunities in his current role have plateaued. Given his longstanding interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency, he starts exploring opportunities in that vertical within the company. This change is not possible without the consent of his immediate boss, Mukesh. When Abhishek brings this up with Mukesh, he acknowledges Abhishek’s curiosity and enthusiasm; however, he emphasizes how Abhishek’s competencies fit him rightly into the current vertical. Mukesh assures Abhishek of more challenging assignments in the future, provided he remains a good team player. Further, he shares his skepticism about the long-term prospects of cryptocurrency. Hence, Mukesh politely declines Abhishek’s request.

    Dissatisfied with Mukesh’s response, Abhishek reaches out to Neha for a vertical change. Though she listens to Abhishek, she shares her displeasure with the request. In fact, she brushes his request off, telling him to resign from Payeasy if it does not charm him anymore. Abhishek gets worried as he has a huge educational loan to pay, and such a departure will put him in a fix.

    Later that day, in one of the team meetings, Abhishek feels ignored as he is cut twice while he tries to share his project progress. Thereafter, he starts believing that Mukesh is not happy with him. This fear appears to get substantiated when Mukesh assigns an important project to another team member, which Abhishek wants to work on. His fear keeps growing regarding Neha and Mukesh not being happy with him. However, when he receives his annual rating, he finds out that Mukesh has rated him as the “best performer” of the year, based on his previous year’s performance.

    Abhishek wants his relationship with Mukesh to be back on track, as it was, before he reached out to Neha.

    Which of the following options will BEST enable Abhishek rebuild his relationship with Mukesh?

    Question 3

    Common Description:

    Fine Elements Inc. is an Indian organization with a substantial presence in South and East India. The company is recruiting talent to expand in North and West India. The organization’s head of talent acquisition, Premnarayan, entrusts the interview process, a key stage in the recruitment process, to his line managers who take the responsibility of selecting candidates. Premnarayan, however, lays down stringent rules that the line managers need to follow to achieve consistent outcomes.

    Joginder Mahato, a line manager, has been interviewing candidates. During the interview, Joginder realizes that one of the candidates, Animisha, called for the interview, does not satisfy the necessary condition of five years experience. Upon enquiring, he finds out that this happened due to an oversight by an inexperienced secretary who was asked to prepare the shortlist for the interview. However, as Animisha is present for the interview, he decides to conduct her interview. Joginder finds Animisha’s candidature to be the best among the candidates he has interviewed so far.

    Joginder shares his preference for Animisha with Premnarayan, the talent acquisition head. However, while rolling out the offer, Premnarayan realizes that Animisha does not meet the eligibility criteria. Though the recommendation has come from Joginder, who is a senior, he wants to reject Animisha for the role.

    Which of the following reasons will BEST help him in rejecting Animisha’s candidature?

    Question 4

    Common Description:

    Fine Elements Inc. is an Indian organization with a substantial presence in South and East India. The company is recruiting talent to expand in North and West India. The organization’s head of talent acquisition, Premnarayan, entrusts the interview process, a key stage in the recruitment process, to his line managers who take the responsibility of selecting candidates. Premnarayan, however, lays down stringent rules that the line managers need to follow to achieve consistent outcomes.

    Joginder Mahato, a line manager, has been interviewing candidates. During the interview, Joginder realizes that one of the candidates, Animisha, called for the interview, does not satisfy the necessary condition of five years experience. Upon enquiring, he finds out that this happened due to an oversight by an inexperienced secretary who was asked to prepare the shortlist for the interview. However, as Animisha is present for the interview, he decides to conduct her interview. Joginder finds Animisha’s candidature to be the best among the candidates he has interviewed so far.

    Joginder wants to recommend Animisha for selection despite her not fulfilling the experience criterion.

    Which of the following reasons, IF TRUE, will BEST convince Joginder to recommend Animisha?

    Question 5

    Common Description:

    The CEO of the Jamshedpur Tea Factory(JTF) was in a quandary over employees skipping work. It was becoming increasingly di cult for him to identify employees who faked illness to skip work. The work of the employees was complex and intricate, and they had to report to eight supervisors. “Faking illness” made it di cult for JTF to judiciously decide on “Promotion” and “Training” of employees. An employee could only be promoted on the completion of a multi-skilling training program. Further, to be nominated for the training program, an employee must be recommended by a minimum of six supervisors. JTF wanted to promote only sincere and deserving employees.

    Which of the following policies will be MOST prone to error while selecting deserving and sincere employees?

    Free preview ends here

    Login to view the complete previous-year questions and solutions

    Creating an account is free. You get the rest of this chapter, step-by-step solutions, and a study plan built around the topics you are actually weak at.

    Login to continueSee plans
    Why MastersUp

    Personalised first. High quality throughout.

    Most platforms hand everyone the same content. Here the content moves with your performance, topic by topic.

    Built around you, not around a syllabus PDF

    Every answer you give moves your topic-level intelligence rate. The next question, the next revision card and tomorrow's plan all change with it.

    Revision that hits your weak spots

    We only revise topics you have actually attempted and are still below the safe bar on — never the same chapter on repeat.

    Questions calibrated to the real exam

    Each question carries a measured toughness. You are served a rung above your current level, so practice keeps stretching you.

    Notes written for recall, not for volume

    Full lesson cards for first study, curated short-note cards for the last mile — with derivations, traps and exam patterns marked.

    One place for everything

    Notes, chapter practice, previous-year questions, test series and full-length papers — all feeding one picture of your preparation.

    Honest progress

    No vanity streaks. Progress here means chapters mastered and accuracy that held up on harder questions.

    Unlock the whole course

    Full notes and short notes, the complete question bank with worked solutions, mock tests, full-length papers, and an adaptive plan that rebuilds itself as you improve.

    View all plansStart free