Number Theory and Pattern Puzzles Practice Questions for XAT: 51+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 51+ Number Theory and Pattern Puzzles practice questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    Chapter Roadmap: Number Theory & Pattern Puzzles

    Chapter Roadmap
    1
    Divisibility and Factors
    The DNA of numbers. Prime factorization, counting factors, and sum of factors.
    2
    HCF and LCM
    The intersection and union of factors. Translating word problems into mathematical logic.
    3
    Remainders and Cyclicity
    Finding the last digits and remainders of massive powers using cyclic patterns.
    4
    Factorials and Trailing Zeros
    Legendre's formula and counting the hidden tens in large products.
    5
    Pattern Puzzles
    Decoding recursive sequences, cyclic operations, and logical constraints.

    The Intuition: Integers as Lego Blocks

    The Intuition
    The Core Philosophy: Every integer greater than 1 is either a prime (a single, unbreakable block) or a composite (a structure built from prime blocks).
    Why this matters for exams:
    Sharing blocks: This is the Highest Common Factor (HCF).
    Combining all blocks: This is the Least Common Multiple (LCM).
    Leftover blocks: This is the Remainder.

    Number Theory and Pattern Puzzles: Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Explanations (5 Problems)

    Question 1 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) MCQ

    For which of the following sets of three positive integers will the incorrect formula accidentally yield the correct product?

    1. A.

      {2, 3, 4}

    2. B.

      {2, 3, 6}

    3. C.

      {3, 4, 1}

    4. D.

      {2, 4, 8}

    Correct Answer:

    C

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a Cheat Sheet / Strategy question testing the boundary of the formula .

    Step 1: Recall the rule.

    The formula is ONLY valid for TWO numbers. For three numbers, it is generally false.

    Step 2: Test the options to find the exception.

    We need a set where .

    Option A: {2, 3, 4}

    HCF = 1, LCM = 12. Product = 24. Formula = 12. (False)

    Option B: {2, 3, 6}

    HCF = 1, LCM = 6. Product = 36. Formula = 6. (False)

    Option C: {3, 4, 1}

    HCF = 1, LCM = 12. Product = 12. Formula = 1 * 12 = 12. (True!)

    Option D: {2, 4, 8}

    HCF = 2, LCM = 8. Product = 64. Formula = 16. (False)

    Step 3: Understand why C works.

    When one of the numbers is 1, the HCF of the set becomes 1.

    The LCM of the set becomes the LCM of the other two numbers.

    So the formula gives .

    The actual product is .

    These are equal if and only if , which happens when and are coprime.

    In {3, 4, 1}, 3 and 4 are coprime.

    Answer: {3, 4, 1}.

    Question 2 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) MCQ

    Let be the number of trailing zeros of when expressed in base 6. How many positive integers satisfy the condition that is a perfect square?

    1. A.

      12

    2. B.

      14

    3. C.

      16

    4. D.

      18

    Correct Answer:

    B

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a synthesis of Legendre's formula for trailing zeros in a non-decimal base and perfect square constraints. We must first determine the formula for in base 6, then count how many yield a perfect square result.

    Step 1: Determine for base 6.

    Base . The number of trailing zeros is determined by the limiting prime factor in the prime factorization of .

    The exponent of a prime in is .

    For base 6, we need pairs of . Since 3 is larger than 2, for all . Thus, the number of trailing zeros is determined by the exponent of 3.

    Step 2: Analyze the range .

    We need to find such that for some integer .

    Let's estimate the maximum value of .

    .

    So possible perfect squares for are (but max is 48, so up to 36).

    Step 3: Count for each perfect square value .

    Note that is a non-decreasing step function. It stays constant for intervals of 3, except at multiples of 9, 27, etc., where it jumps more.

    • : . (2 values)
    • : .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So . (3 values)

    • :

    Check around .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So . (3 values)

    • :

    Check around ? No, approx is too high because of higher powers.

    Let's test values.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So . (3 values)

    • :

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So . (3 values)

    • :

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So . (3 values)

    • :

    .

    .

    .

    (Jump!).

    Wait, let's check near 81 carefully.

    .

    .

    ? No. . . . Sum = 36.

    .

    So . (3 values)

    Total count = ?

    Let me re-evaluate . . Correct.

    Let me re-evaluate ranges.

    Usually, for large , increases by 1 every 3 numbers, but jumps by extra amounts at multiples of 9, 27, etc.

    The number of solutions for is typically 3, unless is hit exactly at a jump point where it might skip or have fewer/more.

    Actually, takes every integer value?

    . (2 vals)

    . (3 vals)

    . (3 vals)

    . Skips 3.

    So has 0 solutions.

    . (3 vals for 4? No, too. So 9,10,11. 3 vals).

    . (3 vals).

    . (3 vals).

    . Skips 7.

    . ( too. So 18,19,20. 3 vals).

    . (3 vals).

    Squares: 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36.

    Values skipped: 3, 7, ...

    Are any squares skipped?

    Sequence of Z(N): 0,0, 1,1,1, 2,2,2, 4,4,4, 5,5,5, 6,6,6, 8,8,8, 9,9,9...

    Squares present:

    0: Yes (2 values)

    1: Yes (3 values)

    4: Yes (3 values)

    9: Yes (3 values)

    16: Yes (3 values)

    25: Yes (3 values)

    36: Yes (3 values)

    Next square 49. . ? No.

    .

    .

    ? . Sum=49.

    But . So 49 is not reached.

    Total = .

    Wait, did I miss any?

    Options are 12, 14, 16, 18. My count 20 is not an option.

    Let me re-read carefully. "Positive integers ".

    Did I calculate correctly?

    Base 6. Limiting factor 3.

    .

    Let's re-verify the "skipped" values.

    Jumps occur at multiples of 9 (jump +1 extra), 27 (jump +1 extra), 81 (jump +1 extra).

    Normal increase is +1 every 3 N.

    At , . Jumped 3.

    At , . Jumped 7.

    At , .

    ? No.

    .

    . Jumped 11, 12.

    Squares:

    0: . (2)

    1: . (3)

    4: . (3)

    9: . (3)

    16: . (3)

    25: . (3)

    36: . (3)

    Is it possible that some squares are skipped?

    Let's check 16 again.

    .

    ?

    . . . Sum=17.

    Ah! .

    .

    So 16 is SKIPPED.

    Let's check 25 again.

    ?

    . . . Sum=26.

    ?

    . . . Sum=26.

    ?

    . . . Sum=26.

    .

    So 24, 25 are SKIPPED.

    Let's check 36 again.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    So 36 is HIT. (3 values: 78, 79, 80).

    Let's check 4, 9, 1, 0 again.

    0: Hit.

    1: Hit.

    4: Hit.

    9: Hit.

    16: Skipped.

    25: Skipped.

    36: Hit.

    Total = .

    Answer: 14

    Question 3 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) MCQ

    The sum of 4 distinct positive integers is 104. What is the maximum possible value of their Highest Common Factor (HCF)?

    1. A.

      10

    2. B.

      8

    3. C.

      13

    4. D.

      26

    Correct Answer:

    B

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a Maximizing GCD with Distinctness question. We need to find the largest HCF that satisfies the sum constraint while keeping the integers distinct.

    Step 1: Express the integers in terms of their HCF.

    Let the HCF be . The 4 integers can be written as , where are distinct positive integers.

    Step 2: Set up the sum equation.

    The sum is .

    This means must be a divisor of 104, and , where .

    Step 3: Minimize the sum of the multipliers .

    To maximize , we must minimize . Since the must be distinct positive integers, the smallest possible values are 1, 2, 3, and 4.

    Minimum .

    Step 4: Find the maximum valid .

    Since , we have .

    We need the largest divisor of 104 that is less than or equal to 10.4.

    The divisors of 104 are: 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 26, 52, 104.

    The largest divisor is 8.

    Step 5: Verify if is possible.

    If , then .

    We need 4 distinct positive integers that sum to 13. For example, 1, 2, 3, and 7 sum to 13.

    Thus, the maximum HCF is 8.

    Answer: 8

    Question 4 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) MCQ

    If the Highest Common Factor (HCF) of two distinct positive integers is 12, which of the following pairs CANNOT be the two integers?

    1. A.

      (12, 36)

    2. B.

      (24, 36)

    3. C.

      (12, 48)

    4. D.

      (24, 48)

    Correct Answer:

    D

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is an HCF Constraint question. We need to identify the pair whose HCF does not match the given value.

    Step 1: Understand the constraint.

    If the HCF of two numbers is 12, both numbers must be multiples of 12. Furthermore, when divided by 12, the resulting quotients must be coprime (their HCF must be 1).

    Step 2: Evaluate each option by finding the HCF.

    • (12, 36): , . Quotients 1 and 3 are coprime. HCF is 12.
    • (24, 36): , . Quotients 2 and 3 are coprime. HCF is 12.
    • (12, 48): , . Quotients 1 and 4 are coprime. HCF is 12.
    • (24, 48): , . Quotients 2 and 4 share a factor of 2. The actual HCF is .

    Step 3: Conclude.

    The pair (24, 48) has an HCF of 24, not 12. Therefore, it cannot be the pair.

    Answer: (24, 48)

    Question 5 · Quantitative Aptitude and Data Interpretation (QA & DI) MCQ

    Let be the set of all integers from 1 to 100. How many elements satisfy the condition that ?

    1. A.

      0

    2. B.

      10

    3. C.

      20

    4. D.

      40

    Correct Answer:

    A

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a Coprime Constraints question that looks like a tedious counting problem but collapses via a simple logical contradiction.

    Step 1: Analyze the GCD condition.

    Let . We are given that as well.

    By definition of GCD, must divide both and .

    Step 2: Apply the properties of divisibility.

    If divides and divides , then must divide their difference:

    .

    The only positive integer that divides 1 is 1 itself.

    Therefore, we must have .

    Step 3: Interpret the result.

    The condition can ONLY be satisfied if both GCDs are exactly 1.

    This means we need AND .

    In other words, both and must be coprime to 100.

    Step 4: Check for parity constraints.

    . For a number to be coprime to 100, it must not be divisible by 2 (i.e., it must be odd).

    However, and are consecutive integers. One of them MUST be even.

    The even number will be divisible by 2, and since 2 divides 100, its GCD with 100 will be at least 2.

    Therefore, it is impossible for BOTH and to be coprime to 100.

    Step 5: Conclusion.

    There are no such integers . The count is 0.

    Answer: 0.

    More practice questions in this unit

    chapter
    Number Theory and Pattern Puzzles Practice Questions for XAT: 51+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 51+ Number Theory and Pattern Puzzles practice questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    A question from this chapter

    Question 1

    For which of the following sets of three positive integers will the incorrect formula accidentally yield the correct product?

    Question 2

    Let be the number of trailing zeros of when expressed in base 6. How many positive integers satisfy the condition that is a perfect square?

    Question 3

    The sum of 4 distinct positive integers is 104. What is the maximum possible value of their Highest Common Factor (HCF)?

    Question 4

    If the Highest Common Factor (HCF) of two distinct positive integers is 12, which of the following pairs CANNOT be the two integers?

    Question 5

    Let be the set of all integers from 1 to 100. How many elements satisfy the condition that ?

    Free preview ends here

    Login to view the complete practice questions and solutions

    Creating an account is free. You get the rest of this chapter, step-by-step solutions, and a study plan built around the topics you are actually weak at.

    Why MastersUp

    Personalised first. High quality throughout.

    Most platforms hand everyone the same content. Here the content moves with your performance, topic by topic.

    Built around you, not around a syllabus PDF

    Every answer you give moves your topic-level intelligence rate. The next question, the next revision card and tomorrow's plan all change with it.

    Revision that hits your weak spots

    We only revise topics you have actually attempted and are still below the safe bar on — never the same chapter on repeat.

    Questions calibrated to the real exam

    Each question carries a measured toughness. You are served a rung above your current level, so practice keeps stretching you.

    Notes written for recall, not for volume

    Full lesson cards for first study, curated short-note cards for the last mile — with derivations, traps and exam patterns marked.

    One place for everything

    Notes, chapter practice, previous-year questions, test series and full-length papers — all feeding one picture of your preparation.

    Honest progress

    No vanity streaks. Progress here means chapters mastered and accuracy that held up on harder questions.

    Unlock the whole course

    Full notes and short notes, the complete question bank with worked solutions, mock tests, full-length papers, and an adaptive plan that rebuilds itself as you improve.