History, Polity & Defence Practice Questions for XAT: 204+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 204+ History, Polity & Defence practice questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    Chapter Roadmap: History, Polity and Defence

    Chapter Journey: History, Polity and Defence

    1. Indian History, Polity and Heritage (Current Focus) 2. Defence and International Organizations By the end of this chapter, you will master: - Chronological ordering of rulers and historical events - Key constitutional provisions and fundamental duties - Recognition of heritage sites, symbols, and political milestones

    Total Chapter Previous Exam Questions: 12
    Your Focus Now: Topic 1 (9 questions)

    Topic Hero: Why History and Polity Matter in General Knowledge

    Indian History, Polity and Heritage: The Big Picture

    Why This Matters for Exams

    Management entrance exams test awareness, not expertise. You need to recognize patterns, sequences, and basic facts about:

    1. Historical Chronology - Who came before whom?
    2. Constitutional Framework - What does the Constitution say?
    3. Cultural Heritage - What represents India's identity?
    4. Political Leadership - Who did what, and when?

    The Four Pillars

    Ancient Civilizations and Temples Constitution and Polity Basics National Symbols and Heritage Political Leaders and Events

    Exam Pattern Insight

    From 9 previous exam questions in this course, the distribution is:

    • Chronology questions: 2 to 3 questions (queens, leaders)
    • Constitutional articles: 1 to 2 questions
    • Heritage and symbols: 2 to 3 questions (ancient sites, temple terms, emblem)
    • Political figures: 2 to 3 questions (Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, global leaders)

    Strategy: Build timelines, memorize key articles, recognize symbols, and know major political milestones.

    History, Polity & Defence: Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Explanations (5 Problems)

    Question 1 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

    When solving a chronological ordering question of historical events, what is the most effective initial strategy to narrow down the options?

    1. A.

      Identify the absolute earliest and latest events to eliminate incorrect sequences

    2. B.

      Guess the sequence based on the length of the event names

    3. C.

      Arrange the events alphabetically by their names

    4. D.

      Focus only on the events you are most familiar with and ignore the rest

    Correct Answer:

    A

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a methodology recall question, recognisable by the phrase "most effective initial strategy" applied to "chronological ordering".

    Step 1: Understand the goal of a chronological ordering question: to arrange items in time sequence.

    Step 2: Recall the standard elimination method for such questions. The most efficient first step is to identify the absolute earliest and latest events in the list, as these are usually the easiest to recall.

    Step 3: Use these anchor points to eliminate options that place these events in the wrong positions.

    Step 4: Verify that the other options represent poor strategies (e.g., alphabetical ordering or ignoring unfamiliar events leads to errors).

    Answer: A

    Question 2 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

    Consider the following statements regarding the intersection of India's Constitutional Emergency Provisions and International Human Rights Law:

    1. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) stipulated that Article 19 can only be suspended when a National Emergency is declared on the grounds of 'war' or 'external aggression', aligning India's domestic derogation threshold with the strict armed-conflict definitions of the Geneva Conventions.
    2. The protection of Articles 20 and 21 from suspension during an Emergency, introduced by the 44th Amendment, was a direct legislative response to the Supreme Court's ADM Jabalpur verdict, bringing India into compliance with the non-derogable right to life recognized under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
    3. Under Article 359, the President can suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, but this power cannot be exercised to suspend the rights guaranteed under Articles 20 and 21, a safeguard that mirrors the non-derogable provisions found in both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
    4. The requirement that a proclamation of Emergency must be based on the written advice of the Union Cabinet (introduced by the 44th Amendment) was designed to prevent unilateral executive action, reflecting the democratic safeguards advocated by the UN Human Rights Council during states of emergency.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    1. A.

      Only one

    2. B.

      Only two

    3. C.

      Only three

    4. D.

      All four

    Correct Answer:

    C

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a high-level synthesis question linking the 44th Amendment's Emergency safeguards with International Human Rights Law (ICCPR, ECHR) and historical Supreme Court verdicts.

    Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1. The 44th Amendment did restrict Article 19 suspension to 'war' or 'external aggression'. However, this aligns with the ICCPR's 'public emergency' threshold, NOT the Geneva Conventions (which deal with International Humanitarian Law and the conduct of armed conflict, not domestic civil liberty derogation). This statement is incorrect.

    Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2. The 44th Amendment protected Articles 20 and 21 from suspension, directly overturning the ADM Jabalpur (Habeas Corpus) case. This aligns with the non-derogable right to life under the ICCPR. This statement is correct.

    Step 3: Evaluate Statement 3. Article 359 cannot suspend Articles 20 and 21. This mirrors non-derogable rights in both the ICCPR (Article 4) and the ECHR (Article 15). This statement is correct.

    Step 4: Evaluate Statement 4. The 44th Amendment required written Cabinet advice for Emergency proclamation to prevent unilateral action (like Indira Gandhi's 1975 decision), reflecting global democratic safeguards advocated by UN bodies. This statement is correct.

    Conclusion: Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct.

    Answer: C

    Question 3 · General Knowledge (GK) MSQ

    Which of the following statements correctly describe the interplay between Constitutional Amendments and the Basic Structure Doctrine as established by the Supreme Court of India?

    A. The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) added the words 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble, and the Supreme Court later ruled in S.R. Bommai (1994) that 'Secularism' is a basic feature that cannot be removed even by a constitutional amendment.

    B. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) removed the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights, but the Supreme Court in I.R. Coelho (2007) held that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, is open to judicial review if it violates the Basic Structure.

    C. The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act (2014) established the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), which was struck down in 2015 primarily because it violated the 'Independence of Judiciary', a recognized basic structure component.

    D. The 101st Amendment Act (2016) introduced GST, and the Supreme Court ruled that the principle of 'Federalism' was destroyed by the creation of the GST Council, rendering the amendment unconstitutional.

    1. A.

      The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) added the words 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble, and the Supreme Court later ruled in S.R. Bommai (1994) that 'Secularism' is a basic feature that cannot be removed even by a constitutional amendment.

    2. B.

      The 44th Amendment Act (1978) removed the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights, but the Supreme Court in I.R. Coelho (2007) held that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, is open to judicial review if it violates the Basic Structure.

    3. C.

      The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act (2014) established the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), which was struck down in 2015 primarily because it violated the 'Independence of Judiciary', a recognized basic structure component.

    4. D.

      The 101st Amendment Act (2016) introduced GST, and the Supreme Court ruled that the principle of 'Federalism' was destroyed by the creation of the GST Council, rendering the amendment unconstitutional.

    Correct Answer:

    ["A","B","C"]

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is an MSQ testing the exact mapping of Constitutional Amendment numbers, their specific provisions, and the landmark Supreme Court cases that applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to them.

    Step 1: Evaluate Option A. The 42nd Amendment (1976) indeed added 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble. In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), the Supreme Court explicitly ruled that Secularism is a part of the Basic Structure. Option A is correct.

    Step 2: Evaluate Option B. The 44th Amendment (1978) removed the Right to Property from Part III (Fundamental Rights) and made it a legal right under Article 300A. In I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), the SC ruled that the Ninth Schedule is not immune from judicial review if the law was inserted after the Kesavananda Bharati judgment date (April 24, 1973) and violates the Basic Structure. Option B is correct.

    Step 3: Evaluate Option C. The 99th Amendment created the NJAC to replace the Collegium system. In the Fourth Judges Case (2015), the SC struck it down as unconstitutional because it compromised the 'Independence of the Judiciary', which is a core component of the Basic Structure. Option C is correct.

    Step 4: Evaluate Option D. The 101st Amendment introduced the GST. The Supreme Court has upheld the GST Council as a mechanism of 'cooperative federalism', not as a destroyer of federalism. The amendment remains fully constitutional. Option D is incorrect.

    Answer: Options A, B, and C are correct.

    Question 4 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

    Consider the following statements regarding India's nuclear weapons programme and doctrine:

    1. India's first nuclear test, codenamed 'Smiling Buddha' (Pokhran-I), was conducted in 1974 and was officially described by the government as a 'Peaceful Nuclear Explosion' (PNE).
    2. The 1998 tests (Pokhran-II), codenamed 'Operation Shakti', included the detonation of both fission and thermonuclear devices.
    3. Following the 1998 tests, India officially signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) but maintained a voluntary moratorium on further testing.
    4. India's nuclear doctrine officially adopts a policy of 'No First Use' (NFU) without any exceptions, even in the event of a major chemical or biological weapons attack.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    1. A.

      Only one

    2. B.

      Only two

    3. C.

      Only three

    4. D.

      All four

    Correct Answer:

    B

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a historical and doctrinal verification question testing specific codenames, treaty statuses, and the exact caveats of India's nuclear policy.

    Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1. Pokhran-I (1974) was indeed codenamed 'Smiling Buddha' and officially termed a Peaceful Nuclear Explosion (PNE). This statement is correct.

    Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2. Pokhran-II (1998), codenamed 'Operation Shakti', involved multiple detonations, including a fission device and a thermonuclear (fusion) device. This statement is correct.

    Step 3: Evaluate Statement 3. India has never signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), citing its discriminatory nature. It only maintains a unilateral, voluntary moratorium. This statement is incorrect.

    Step 4: Evaluate Statement 4. While India's doctrine adopts a 'No First Use' (NFU) policy, the 2003 Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) review added a specific caveat: India reserves the right to retaliate with nuclear weapons if deterrence fails against a major attack using chemical or biological weapons. This statement is incorrect.

    Conclusion: Only Statements 1 and 2 are correct.

    Answer: B

    Question 5 · General Knowledge (GK) MCQ

    Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of India's military command structure and its constitutional basis:

    1. Under Article 53 of the Constitution, the Supreme Command of the Defence Forces is vested in the President, but the abolition of the 'Commander-in-Chief' title in 1955 effectively transferred this operational supremacy to the Prime Minister as the head of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS).
    2. The creation of the post of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) in 2020 was achieved through a constitutional amendment under Article 309 to ensure statutory permanence of the tri-service integration.
    3. Historically, the title of 'Commander-in-Chief, Indian Army' was held by British officers until 1949, when K.M. Cariappa became the first Indian C-in-C, a title that was later replaced by 'Chief of the Army Staff' (COAS) in 1955.
    4. The Andaman and Nicobar Command (ANC), established in 2001, operates directly under the constitutional authority of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) due to its strategic geographical significance in internal maritime security.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    1. A.

      Only one

    2. B.

      Only two

    3. C.

      Only three

    4. D.

      All four

    Correct Answer:

    A

    Step-by-Step Solution

    Key idea: This is a multi-concept synthesis question testing the intersection of Constitutional provisions (Article 53), historical military titles, and modern tri-service command structures.

    Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1. Article 53 vests the Supreme Command in the President. The abolition of the C-in-C title in 1955 distributed operational command among the three service chiefs (and later the MoD/CDS), it did NOT transfer operational supremacy to the PM as a constitutional replacement. This statement is incorrect.

    Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2. The post of CDS was created via an executive resolution and an amendment to the Allocation of Business Rules (Transaction of Business) Rules, NOT through a Constitutional Amendment under Article 309. This statement is incorrect.

    Step 3: Evaluate Statement 3. K.M. Cariappa became the first Indian Commander-in-Chief in 1949. The title was indeed replaced by 'Chief of the Army Staff' (COAS) in 1955. This statement is correct.

    Step 4: Evaluate Statement 4. The Andaman and Nicobar Command (ANC) is a tri-service theatre command that operates under the Integrated Defence Staff (IDS) / Ministry of Defence (MoD), NOT the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). This statement is incorrect.

    Conclusion: Only Statement 3 is correct.

    Answer: A

    More practice questions in this unit

    chapter
    History, Polity & Defence Practice Questions for XAT: 204+ Solved Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions

    Solve 204+ History, Polity & Defence practice questions for XAT with answers and detailed solutions. Free sample questions below.

    A question from this chapter

    Question 1

    When solving a chronological ordering question of historical events, what is the most effective initial strategy to narrow down the options?

    Question 2

    Consider the following statements regarding the intersection of India's Constitutional Emergency Provisions and International Human Rights Law:

    1. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) stipulated that Article 19 can only be suspended when a National Emergency is declared on the grounds of 'war' or 'external aggression', aligning India's domestic derogation threshold with the strict armed-conflict definitions of the Geneva Conventions.
    2. The protection of Articles 20 and 21 from suspension during an Emergency, introduced by the 44th Amendment, was a direct legislative response to the Supreme Court's ADM Jabalpur verdict, bringing India into compliance with the non-derogable right to life recognized under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
    3. Under Article 359, the President can suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, but this power cannot be exercised to suspend the rights guaranteed under Articles 20 and 21, a safeguard that mirrors the non-derogable provisions found in both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
    4. The requirement that a proclamation of Emergency must be based on the written advice of the Union Cabinet (introduced by the 44th Amendment) was designed to prevent unilateral executive action, reflecting the democratic safeguards advocated by the UN Human Rights Council during states of emergency.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    Question 3

    Which of the following statements correctly describe the interplay between Constitutional Amendments and the Basic Structure Doctrine as established by the Supreme Court of India?

    A. The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) added the words 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble, and the Supreme Court later ruled in S.R. Bommai (1994) that 'Secularism' is a basic feature that cannot be removed even by a constitutional amendment.

    B. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) removed the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights, but the Supreme Court in I.R. Coelho (2007) held that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, is open to judicial review if it violates the Basic Structure.

    C. The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act (2014) established the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), which was struck down in 2015 primarily because it violated the 'Independence of Judiciary', a recognized basic structure component.

    D. The 101st Amendment Act (2016) introduced GST, and the Supreme Court ruled that the principle of 'Federalism' was destroyed by the creation of the GST Council, rendering the amendment unconstitutional.

    Question 4

    Consider the following statements regarding India's nuclear weapons programme and doctrine:

    1. India's first nuclear test, codenamed 'Smiling Buddha' (Pokhran-I), was conducted in 1974 and was officially described by the government as a 'Peaceful Nuclear Explosion' (PNE).
    2. The 1998 tests (Pokhran-II), codenamed 'Operation Shakti', included the detonation of both fission and thermonuclear devices.
    3. Following the 1998 tests, India officially signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) but maintained a voluntary moratorium on further testing.
    4. India's nuclear doctrine officially adopts a policy of 'No First Use' (NFU) without any exceptions, even in the event of a major chemical or biological weapons attack.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    Question 5

    Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of India's military command structure and its constitutional basis:

    1. Under Article 53 of the Constitution, the Supreme Command of the Defence Forces is vested in the President, but the abolition of the 'Commander-in-Chief' title in 1955 effectively transferred this operational supremacy to the Prime Minister as the head of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS).
    2. The creation of the post of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) in 2020 was achieved through a constitutional amendment under Article 309 to ensure statutory permanence of the tri-service integration.
    3. Historically, the title of 'Commander-in-Chief, Indian Army' was held by British officers until 1949, when K.M. Cariappa became the first Indian C-in-C, a title that was later replaced by 'Chief of the Army Staff' (COAS) in 1955.
    4. The Andaman and Nicobar Command (ANC), established in 2001, operates directly under the constitutional authority of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) due to its strategic geographical significance in internal maritime security.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    Free preview ends here

    Login to view the complete practice questions and solutions

    Creating an account is free. You get the rest of this chapter, step-by-step solutions, and a study plan built around the topics you are actually weak at.

    Login to continueSee plans
    Why MastersUp

    Personalised first. High quality throughout.

    Most platforms hand everyone the same content. Here the content moves with your performance, topic by topic.

    Built around you, not around a syllabus PDF

    Every answer you give moves your topic-level intelligence rate. The next question, the next revision card and tomorrow's plan all change with it.

    Revision that hits your weak spots

    We only revise topics you have actually attempted and are still below the safe bar on — never the same chapter on repeat.

    Questions calibrated to the real exam

    Each question carries a measured toughness. You are served a rung above your current level, so practice keeps stretching you.

    Notes written for recall, not for volume

    Full lesson cards for first study, curated short-note cards for the last mile — with derivations, traps and exam patterns marked.

    One place for everything

    Notes, chapter practice, previous-year questions, test series and full-length papers — all feeding one picture of your preparation.

    Honest progress

    No vanity streaks. Progress here means chapters mastered and accuracy that held up on harder questions.

    Unlock the whole course

    Full notes and short notes, the complete question bank with worked solutions, mock tests, full-length papers, and an adaptive plan that rebuilds itself as you improve.

    View all plansStart free