Key idea: this question combines multiplicative order with divisor-count structure. First find the exact order of 3 modulo 17. Then find the smallest multiple of that order having exactly 18 divisors.
Step 1: Find the order of 3 modulo 17.
Compute powers of 3:
32=9,
34=81β‘13(mod17),
38β‘132=169β‘16β‘β1(mod17).
Therefore
316β‘1(mod17).
We must check that no smaller divisor of 16 works. The divisors of 16 are 1,2,4,8.
31ξ β‘1,32=9ξ β‘1,34β‘13ξ β‘1,38β‘β1ξ β‘1.
Hence the order is 16.
Step 2: Translate the congruence condition.
Since the order is 16,
3nβ‘1(mod17)βΊ16β£n.
So n must be a multiple of 16.
Step 3: Use the divisor-count condition.
We need d(n)=18. Since
18=18=9β
2=6β
3=3β
3β
2,
the possible exponent patterns in the prime factorisation of n are:
p17,p8q,p5q2,p2q2r.
Also, n must be divisible by 16=24, so the exponent of 2 in n must be at least 4.
Step 4: Minimise n under these patterns.
Pattern p17: the smallest multiple of 16 is 217, which is very large.
Pattern p8q: to have 24β£n, the exponent of 2 must be 8, so the smallest number is
28β
3=768.
Pattern p5q2: to have 24β£n, the exponent of 2 can be 5, and the smallest square is 32. This gives
25β
32=32β
9=288.
Pattern p2q2r: no prime exponent exceeds 2, so 24 cannot divide n. This pattern is impossible.
Step 5: Compare the viable candidates.
The smallest viable candidate is 288.
Check:
288=25β
32,
so
d(288)=(5+1)(2+1)=6β
3=18.
Also 16β£288, so 3288β‘1(mod17).
Answer: 288.
Common trap: using Fermatβs theorem loosely and assuming n only has to be a multiple of 8 or 4. The exact order is needed. Another trap is choosing a number with 18 divisors, such as 180, without checking the order condition; 180 is not divisible by 16.