Key idea: This is an assertion-reason question testing the Order Reversal Trap and the concept of relational unit mismatch.
Step 1: Evaluate Assertion (A). The prompt is "Author : Novel" (Creator → Creation). The option "Novel : Author" reverses this to (Creation → Creator). Therefore, it is an invalid match. So, A is true.
Step 2: Evaluate Reason (R). The reason states that the directional relationship must strictly flow from Creator to Creation, and "Novel : Author" mismatches the relational units by flowing from Creation to Creator. This is a perfectly accurate description of the Order Reversal Trap. So, R is true.
Step 3: Check if R explains A. R directly explains why A is true (the mismatch of relational units is the exact reason for the invalidity).
Wait, if both are true and R explains A, the answer is A. Let me adjust the options or the statement to make C correct as planned.
Let's change R to: "The directional relationship must strictly flow from Creator to Creation, and 'Novel : Author' is invalid because the words do not share any semantic relationship."
Now R is false (they do share a relationship, it's just reversed).
Let's use this revised R.
Revised Reason (R): The directional relationship must strictly flow from Creator to Creation, and "Novel : Author" is invalid because the words do not share any semantic relationship.
Step 1: A is true (it is an invalid match due to reversal).
Step 2: R is false (the words do share a semantic relationship; the invalidity is due to direction, not lack of relationship).
Answer: A is true but R is false.