Assertion (A): The conjecture implies that for every satisfying , there is a specific (which may depend on ) satisfying .
Reason (R): The existential quantifier is inside the scope of the universal quantifier , meaning the choice of is independent of .
Which of the following options is correct?
C
Step-by-Step Solution
Key idea: The order of nested quantifiers dictates dependency. An existential quantifier inside a universal quantifier means the existential variable depends on the universal variable.
Exam route: Assertion A correctly states that may depend on because is inside . Reason R claims that being inside the scope means is independent of , which is the exact opposite of the truth. Thus, A is true, but R is false.
Learning route:
Step 1: Evaluate Assertion (A). The statement means "for every , there is a ". The can be chosen differently for each . Thus, depends on . A is True.
Step 2: Evaluate Reason (R). The reason claims that being inside means is independent of . This is false. Scope dependency means the inner variable depends on the outer variable. R is False.
Step 3: Combine the evaluations. A is true, but R is false.
Answer: A is true but R is false (Option C).
Tempting wrong path: A student might confuse the scope rule, thinking that being "inside" the scope isolates the variable, making it independent (Option A). This breaks at misunderstanding the direction of quantifier dependency.
Generalization: Inner quantifiers depend on outer quantifiers. means depends on .
Verification: If were independent, the statement would be written , meaning a single works for all .